Topic: Culture jamming and the mainstream media
In my opinion, I agree with satirical news and culture jamming. The text says that “culture jamming exposes and opposes the media’s underlying power structures and ideological messages” (213). It then goes on to say it’s a “form of media activism that…parodies major corporations, public figures,and their media images” (213). I feel as though culture jamming exposes the secrets that media tries to hide and brings them to the front lines for everyone to see, while entertaining us. A lot of controversy has been going around about Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. There has been many parodies talking about how much of a scumbag he is for getting drunk, smoking crack and disregarding his responsibility as Mayor. Recently Jon Stewart from The Daily Show has made many cracks at Mayor Ford, even David Letterman (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLyV41kcNv8). While the parodies like this are quite entertaining they also make the viewer aware of what is happening in the “real” news. Many young people don’t watch the 6 or 11 o’clock news so this is a way for them to find out about what’s going on, while being entertained. These parodies also gets people talking about these subjects. Many people have been talking about the Toronto Mayor and many want him to resign, or are talking about not voting for him in the next municipal election.
There are also many satirical comic strips or comedic pictures in the news papers that poke fun at politicians. For instance:
http://apictureofpolitics.wordpress.com/category/political-art/page/2/
While culture jamming draws lots of attention to young people and brings up important issues, sometimes the true message gets lost in the comedy. There’s an episode of Jimmy Fallon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rboByPlU4IM) where the massage behind the video get’s lost in the comedy.
I think this type of news reporting is very useful. Though it may take away from “real” news it really does bring attention to other things in the media. On page 220, the text talks about how paranoid people are about terrorism. “The jammers wanted to reveal the subtexts and potential side effects of fear campaigns…(220). Many advertisements warn people about not letting their children walk home alone, and to be suspicious of bags that are unattended. While the advertisements mean well all they seem to do is make people fearful. That’s how the media gets the attention of people, they use fear. The media also has a tendency to blow things out of proportion. Crime is at one of its slowest points right now yet the media always reports on crime and makes a huge scene about it, and that’s why it’s good for these jammers to bring a sort of reality check to media.
-Linnea
(447 words)